4KY1

humanized HP1/2 Fab


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.97 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.284 
  • R-Value Work: 0.206 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.210 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Antibody humanization by redesign of complementarity-determining region residues proximate to the acceptor framework.

Hanf, K.J.Arndt, J.W.Chen, L.L.Jarpe, M.Boriack-Sjodin, P.A.Li, Y.van Vlijmen, H.W.Pepinsky, R.B.Simon, K.J.Lugovskoy, A.

(2014) Methods 65: 68-76

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.024
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    4KY1

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Antibodies are key components of the adaptive immune system and are well-established protein therapeutic agents. Typically high-affinity antibodies are obtained by immunization of rodent species that need to be humanized to reduce their immunogenicity. The complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) contain the residues in a defined loop structure that confer antigen binding, which must be retained in the humanized antibody. To design a humanized antibody, we graft the mature murine CDRs onto a germline human acceptor framework. Structural defects due to mismatches at the graft interface can be fixed by mutating some framework residues to murine, or by mutating some residues on the CDRs' backside to human or to a de novo designed sequence. The first approach, framework redesign, can yield an antibody with binding better than the CDR graft and one equivalent to the mature murine, and reduced immunogenicity. The second approach, CDR redesign, is presented here as a new approach, yielding an antibody with binding better than the CDR graft, and immunogenicity potentially less than that from framework redesign. Application of both approaches to the humanization of anti-α4 integrin antibody HP1/2 is presented and the concept of the hybrid humanization approach that retains "difficult to match" murine framework amino acids and uses de novo CDR design to minimize murine amino acid content and reduce cell-mediated cytotoxicity liabilities is discussed.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Biogen Idec, 12 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States. Electronic address: karl.hanf@biogenidec.com.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
IMMUNOGLOBULIN IGG1 FAB, LIGHT CHAINA [auth L]213Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
IMMUNOGLOBULIN IGG1 FAB, HEAVY CHAINB [auth H]220Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.97 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.284 
  • R-Value Work: 0.206 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.210 
  • Space Group: I 2 2 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 82.01α = 90
b = 100.902β = 90
c = 140.188γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
SCALEPACKdata scaling
REFMACrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
HKL-2000data collection

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2013-07-24
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2014-01-22
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2023-09-20
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description