SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2 mM 2',5' RNA-1, 4 mM PROFLAVINE-2, 60 mM Sodium Phosphate-3, 200 mM sodium chloride-4, 99.9% D2O
Solvent99.9% D2O
Ionic Strength260
pH6.5
Pressure1
Temperature (K)282
Experiment(s):1H-1H NOESY, 31P-1H HETCOR, 1H-1H TOCSY, 31P-decoupled 1H-1H COSY
Sample Contents2 mM 2',5' RNA-1, 4 mM PROFLAVINE-2, 60 mM Sodium Phosphate-3, 200 mM sodium chloride-4, 99.9% D2O
Solvent99.9% D2O
Ionic Strength130
pHn/a
Pressure1
Temperature (K)282
Experiment(s):1H-1H NOESY with WATERGATE water suppression
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker DRX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details 300 random structures were generated and annealed. The lowest 10 energy structures were then re-annealed
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 10
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection xwinnmr Bruker Biospin
2 data analysis xwinnmr Bruker Biospin
3 processing xwinnmr Bruker Biospin
4 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
5 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
6 structure solution AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollm
7 refinement AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollm