1ZCN | pdb_00001zcn

human Pin1 Ng mutant


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.269 (Depositor), 0.260 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.226 (Depositor), 0.220 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.228 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structure-function-folding relationship in a WW domain.

Jager, M.Zhang, Y.Bieschke, J.Nguyen, H.Dendel, G.Bowman, M.E.Noel, J.P.Gruebele, M.Kelly, J.W.

(2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10648-10653

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600511103
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1ZCN, 2F21

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Protein folding barriers result from a combination of factors including unavoidable energetic frustration from nonnative interactions, natural variation and selection of the amino acid sequence for function, and/or selection pressure against aggregation. The rate-limiting step for human Pin1 WW domain folding is the formation of the loop 1 substructure. The native conformation of this six-residue loop positions side chains that are important for mediating protein-protein interactions through the binding of Pro-rich sequences. Replacement of the wild-type loop 1 primary structure by shorter sequences with a high propensity to fold into a type-I' beta-turn conformation or the statistically preferred type-I G1 bulge conformation accelerates WW domain folding by almost an order of magnitude and increases thermodynamic stability. However, loop engineering to optimize folding energetics has a significant downside: it effectively eliminates WW domain function according to ligand-binding studies. The energetic contribution of loop 1 to ligand binding appears to have evolved at the expense of fast folding and additional protein stability. Thus, the two-state barrier exhibited by the wild-type human Pin1 WW domain principally results from functional requirements, rather than from physical constraints inherent to even the most efficient loop formation process.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, BCC265, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 1161Homo sapiensMutation(s): 1 
Gene Names: PIN1
EC: 5.2.1.8
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for Q13526 (Homo sapiens)
Explore Q13526 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q13526
PHAROS:  Q13526
GTEx:  ENSG00000127445 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ13526
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.269 (Depositor), 0.260 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.226 (Depositor), 0.220 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.228 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 43 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 49.108α = 90
b = 49.108β = 90
c = 135.095γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
HKL-2000data collection
SCALEPACKdata scaling
AMoREphasing
CNSrefinement
HKL-2000data reduction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2006-06-20
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-29
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2021-10-20
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.4: 2023-08-23
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description