8C3E | pdb_00008c3e

Engineered mini-protein LCB2 (blocking ligand of SARS-Cov-2 spike protein)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.10 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.249 (Depositor), 0.247 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.209 (Depositor), 0.209 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.220 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: in silico
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 2.1 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Using multiple computer-predicted structures as molecular replacement models: application to the antiviral mini-protein LCB2.

Korban, S.A.Mikhailovskii, O.Gurzhiy, V.V.Podkorytov, I.S.Skrynnikov, N.R.

(2025) IUCrJ 12: 488-501

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252525005123
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    8C3E

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    In this report, we describe a set of structures of the engineered protein LCB2 that has been solved starting from different computer-predicted molecular replacement (MR) models. We found that AlphaFold3, AlphaFold2, MultiFOLD, Rosetta, RoseTTAFold and trRosetta all produced successful MR models for this three-helix bundle 58-residue protein, while some of the older predictors failed. To assign B factors in the MR models we used the predictor-generated confidence scores or, as a convenient alternative, the accessible surface area (ASA) values. The process of multi-start structure determination using Coot and Phenix demonstrated good convergence, leading to six structures within 0.25 Å (all-atom RMSD) of each other. Of note, structural differences between the computer-predicted MR models and the final structures can be largely attributed to a single specific crystal contact. Comparing the six structural solutions, we observe that a number of surface side chains have been solved with different conformations. Interestingly, for each individual structure the electron density is consistent with a single rotameric state and offers no direct evidence of conformational heterogeneity. Strictly speaking, this behavior constitutes a case of model bias; we argue, however, that it represents a benign side of model bias. Specifically, when we use a model where the side-chain conformation corresponds to one of the actual (significantly populated) rotameric states, this leads to an enhancement of the electron density for this particular conformation. Conversely, when we use a model with an irrelevant (low-population) side-chain conformation, it fails to produce the matching electron density. We thus conclude that the six LCB2 structures obtained in this study can be grouped into a multiconformer ensemble, where structural variations are representative of protein's conformational dynamics. Indeed, using this six-member ensemble leads to a significant drop in R work and R free compared with the individual solutions. This interpretation was also supported by our MD simulations of the LCB2 crystal.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Laboratory of Biomolecular NMR, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation.

Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Engineered protein LCB258synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.10 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.249 (Depositor), 0.247 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.209 (Depositor), 0.209 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.220 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 31 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 57.817α = 90
b = 57.817β = 90
c = 41.54γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
CrysalisProdata collection
autoPROCdata processing
autoPROCdata reduction
autoPROCdata scaling
PHENIXphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
St. Petersburg State UniversityRussian Federation94031251

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2023-04-12
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2024-06-19
    Changes: Data collection
  • Version 2.0: 2025-01-22
    Type: Coordinate replacement
    Reason: Model completeness
    Changes: Advisory, Atomic model, Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description, Structure summary
  • Version 2.1: 2025-07-23
    Changes: Database references